So, what episode are we at with the #Twitter Blue Checkmark saga? Here's the rough timeline as I understand it:
- Before Elon Musk: Checkmark is attributed discretionarily, mainly to prevent impersonation.
- After Elon Musk:
- Twitter Blue subscription is introduced that grants the checkmark.
- Impersonation immediately ensues. Twitter answers by preventing Checkmark accounts from changing their display name.
- Checkmark is divided in three colors: Gold for companies, Blue for individuals, Grey for government.
- Checkmark is derided for being bought out. As a response Twitter Blue subscribers ask for their checkmark to be hidden.
- Prominent accounts (like Beyoncรฉ) lose their checkmark.
- Prominent accounts that kept their checkmark (like Ron Perlman) defend themselves from claims they have subscribed to Twitter Blue.
Am I missing anything? Even twitterisgoinggreat.com can't keep up with the madness.
This entry was edited (1 year ago)
like this
Kat Moss reshared this.
silverwizard
in reply to Hypolite Petovan • •(Nitter addon enabled: Twitter links via https://nitter.net)
Hypolite Petovan likes this.
Hypolite Petovan
in reply to silverwizard • • •(Nitter addon enabled: Twitter links via https://nitter.net)
Hypolite Petovan
in reply to Hypolite Petovan • • •(Nitter addon enabled: Twitter links via https://nitter.net)
๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฎ
in reply to Hypolite Petovan • • •Hypolite Petovan likes this.
Hypolite Petovan
in reply to ๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฎ • • •Martijn Vos
in reply to Hypolite Petovan • • •Hypolite Petovan
in reply to Martijn Vos • • •Martijn Vos
in reply to Hypolite Petovan • • •