Skip to main content


I really don't understand people's existential horror at Star Trek transporters.

If you're a materialist - why do you care if your body is preserved alongside your mind. Why is it a problem that you get stored in a pattern buffer?

If you're not a materialist - why do you care about the body and not the soul? Why do you think your soul would become untethered because of changes in your body? I don't get it!

in reply to silverwizard

I once had a conversation in a philosophy of the mind class, where we were spitballing some things on a similar topic.

A lot of our everyday intuitions on our idea of a "self" involve that self having an unbroken continuity. (Whether one believes this is accurate or not.)

Most things that break that continuity give us the heebie-jeebies when put under a mental microscope.

in reply to trashHeap

@trashHeap That's valid. I mean - I am kinda a Lockean on this one - where conciousness is the thing and discontinuity happens (I've fainted before). Sure, I get why it feels weird. But... it's such a meme at this point - I don't... get it!
in reply to silverwizard

Maybe it shines too much of a spotlight onto the fact that a person is, much like a legal entity, a fiction; created by shared understanding, which is also a fiction.

You cant move files onto a USB stick - you can only copy them, then delete the first copy.

You can believe in materialism, and computer-files, while still feeling uncomfortable with the full implications.

in reply to Malin

@Malin Interesting - so you think that it's about the ability to copy. Thomas Riker is the real prior art here - but also kinda the counter example. Mirroring the pattern was supposed to be impossible - the idea of copying something with the transporter is impossible properly.

Maybe it's true - the idea of digital information is what's causing the issue - computers can only properly copy - but as envisioned in the 60s there's this idea that you can be transformed into a "matter stream" and stored in a buffer and it's fine. But now people don't materially engage with that...

in reply to silverwizard

Riker's twin makes a great example, along with that guy with the fear of transporters.

I think the fear comes from really thinking about what the real process is, but you're probably right that people understand it more now from working with files.